The Philadelphia Eagles have been exonerated by the NFL following a thorough investigation into allegations of tampering with then-free agent running back Saquon Barkley.

The probe, which spanned nearly three months, concluded without uncovering any evidence of foul play, thereby absolving the Eagles of any penalties

The investigation was launched amid speculation that the Eagles had engaged in improper communication with Barkley prior to his signing.

However, the NFL’s statement made clear that their comprehensive review did not support these claims.

“After a thorough review of the Philadelphia Eagles’ signing of Saquon Barkley, the NFL today informed the club that the investigation did not discover sufficient evidence to support a finding that the Anti-Tampering Policy was violated,” read the official statement.

The investigation involved an examination of phone logs, text messages, and other pertinent documents related to the Eagles’ free agency strategy.

Key figures, including Eagles General Manager Howie Roseman, Head Coach Nick Sirianni, Barkley himself, and Penn State Head Coach James Franklin, were interviewed during the process.

The probe was initiated after Franklin’s comments suggested that Barkley and Roseman had communicated directly during the legal tampering period.

Barkley later clarified that Franklin had misinterpreted the situation.

Despite these public remarks, the NFL found no direct evidence of prohibited contact.

The NFL’s investigation into potential tampering typically involves a thorough examination of evidence, including communications between teams and players or their agents. However, sometimes this evidence may not be conclusive enough to warrant disciplinary action. In such cases, the league may not find enough evidence to support allegations of tampering. It’s crucial for the NFL to maintain the integrity of its rules and regulations, but without substantial evidence, it can be challenging to impose penalties.

It’s also worth noting that tampering investigations can be complex and time-consuming, involving multiple parties and layers of communication. Despite efforts to uncover wrongdoing, there may be instances where the evidence is insufficient to prove tampering beyond a reasonable doubt.

In situations where tampering is suspected but not proven, the NFL may still take measures to remind teams of the importance of adhering to league rules and regulations regarding player recruitment and contract negotiations. Additionally, the league may implement measures to enhance monitoring and enforcement efforts to prevent future tampering incidents.